It observed that it is important to accept there is a problem – dogs may become ferocious due to lack of food or they may get an infection. The bench emphasised that it is essential to find the solution of stray dogs’ menace and need to create a balance between people who feed stray dogs and also protect innocent people from being attacked by stray dogs. “They will be responsible for vaccinating them and bearing the cost if a person is attacked,” he said. Maheshwari was hearing petitions in connection with the stray dogs’ menace in Kerala, Justice Khanna orally observed that he is a dog lover and there are many dog lovers and suggested that people who feed stray dogs could possibly keep a number or marking on the dog they feed. Tags: High Court Supreme Court stray dogs stray dogs guidelines Follow Breaking News on abp LIVE for more latest stories and trending topics.The Supreme Court on Friday suggested people who routinely feed stray dogs could be made responsible for their vaccination and also liable to bear the costs if those animals attack people, while emphasising on a need to find a solution to the stray dogs’ menace.Īs a bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and J.K. They also provide companionship to those who feed them act as their stress relievers, the High Court had noted. The High Court also said that street dogs perform the role of community scavengers and control rodent population in a locality, thus preventing disease like leptospirosis. "Community dogs (stray/street dogs) have the right to food and citizens have the right to feed community dogs but in exercising this right, care and caution should be taken to ensure that it does not impinge upon the rights of others or cause any harm, hindrance, harassment and nuisance to other individuals or members of the society," the High Court had said. It had further said that every dog is a territorial being and it has to be fed and tended to at places within their territory which is not frequented by the general public.ĪLSO READ: UP Election 2022 Phase 7 Voting Live: 8.58% Turnout Recorded Till 9 AM, Nearly 9% Polling In VaranasiĪny person having compassion for stray dogs can feed them at their private entrance or driveway of their house or any other place not shared with other residents but no one can restrict the other from feeding dogs, until and unless it is causing harm or harassment to them, it had said. The Delhi High Court in its guideline had stated that stray dogs have the right to food and citizens have the right to feed while observing care and caution that it does not cause nuisance or harassment. This is not the case with stray dogs, therefore feeding in societies, streets or at any public places is a direct risk to citizens," the NGO said. "A dog under human supervision and control and dependent on its human caretakers for all of its needs can be prevented from biting and attacking people and other animals by physical restraint, confinement to private property and suppressing aggressive tendencies with care and training. While challenging the High Court order, dated June 24, 2021, in the Supreme Court, the Humane Foundation for People & Animal said that the High Court’s decision would lead to an increase in the menace of street dogs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |